App Comparison

FatSecret vs MyFitnessPal

Fuel Nutrition Team • March 16, 2026

FatSecret

3/ 10
VS

MyFitnessPal

5/ 10
MyFitnessPal screenshot

Feature comparison

Feature
FatSecret
MyFitnessPal

Price

FatSecretFree with ads + optional Premium
MyFitnessPalFree tier + $19.99/mo Premium

Barcode scanning

FatSecretFree
MyFitnessPalPremium only ($19.99/mo)

Database

FatSecretCrowd-sourced — frequent inaccuracies, correction requests ignored
MyFitnessPal14M+ crowd-sourced — largest but accuracy varies

Ads

FatSecretPresent but less intrusive
MyFitnessPalIntrusive — graphic food imagery in log feed

Search UX

FatSecretRecents locked by meal context, no search in recents
MyFitnessPalBroad search with database scale advantage

Recipe workflow

FatSecretForced sharing settings, can't edit nutrition in cookbook
MyFitnessPalCommunity recipes, basic editing

Apple Watch

FatSecretNot available
MyFitnessPalBasic logging

Coaching

FatSecretNone
MyFitnessPalNone — static calorie target

Support

FatSecretCorrection requests ignored indefinitely
MyFitnessPalStandard support

FatSecret and MyFitnessPal both rely on crowd-sourced food databases — FatSecret as a free-first simple tracker, MyFitnessPal as the mainstream default with the largest database in the category. If you're choosing between free simplicity and paid scale, here's what to consider.

Pricing

FatSecret's strongest argument is value. Barcode scanning is free. The core tracking experience is free. There's a Premium upgrade but the free tier is functional.

MyFitnessPal locks barcode scanning — the most fundamental logging shortcut — behind a $19.99/month Premium subscription. The free tier works but is cluttered with intrusive ads, including graphic food imagery in the log feed.

Database

MyFitnessPal's 14-million-entry database dwarfs FatSecret's. If you eat a wide variety of branded foods, MFP's coverage is harder to beat. Both are crowd-sourced, so accuracy varies — but MFP has more entries to choose from.

FatSecret's database has a higher rate of inaccurate entries with no meaningful correction path. Users report submitting error tickets that go unacknowledged indefinitely. At least MyFitnessPal's scale means you're more likely to find an accurate entry among the duplicates.

Search & Logging UX

FatSecret's search UX hasn't kept up. Recent foods are context-locked by meal type, can't be searched, and require scrolling through an undifferentiated list. When a barcode scan fails, you must back all the way out and start over.

MyFitnessPal's search is faster with better coverage, but serving-size options are often limited to "1 unit" rather than gram-level options, making precision difficult.

What Both Lack

Neither app offers coaching, adaptive goal adjustment, AI-powered logging, or a meaningful Apple Watch experience. Both depend on crowd-sourced databases that require user verification. Neither will tell you what to do differently tomorrow based on how you ate today.

Verdict

If free barcode scanning matters and your needs are basic, FatSecret works. If you need the broadest food database and can afford $19.99/month, MyFitnessPal's scale is the category leader. Both are crowd-sourced calorie counters with no coaching layer.

Want to move beyond database-dependent tracking entirely? Fuel uses AI logging from photos, text, and voice — no database to trust or distrust — with coaching that turns your data into daily action.